Search Blog:







UnitedHealth Group Defrauding Customers

New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo rocked the United States’ healthcare industry earlier this month after announcing that Ingenix, Inc., was providing faulty information to the nation’s largest healthcare insurers.  After an investigation into UnitedHealth Group’s- the parent company of Ingenix, Inc.- reimbursement process for out-of-network medical services, Cuomo discovered that UGH was defrauding customers by setting artificially low rates for patients, and therefore leaving them to foot most of their medical bills. Cuomo charged Ingenix, Inc., the nation’s largest healthcare billing information provider, with falsifying and manipulating their database.  The exploitation of their database had catastrophic effects because many of the nation’s largest healthcare insurance firms use the information provided by Ingenix, Inc. to determine reimbursement rates for out-of-network care.  The Attorney General is still investigating the extent to which the insurance industry as a whole is involved.  Currently, Cuomo has issued 16 subpoenas to the country’s largest health insurance providers including: Empire BlueCross Blue Shield, CIGNA, Aetna, as well as UnitedHealth Group and three of its subsidiaries.


As of current, Cuomo has not sued the company as he is investigating, in his words, "[an] industry-wide scheme perpetrated by some of the nation's largest health insurance companies to defraud consumers."  UnitedHealth Group has recently consented to pay $350 million to reimburse patients as settlement and terminate the lawsuit.  However, some feel a more personal attack by Ingenix, Inc.  Jeffrey Wientraub of Connecticut is rallying for a class action suit against Ingenix, Inc. itself.   Only time will tell the extent to which the health insurance industry has been infiltrated and the futures of both UnitedHealth Group and the nation’s health insurance industry as a whole.

Posted on 2009-01-26 | Comment on this post | Send to a friend | Printer-friendly version


Proposed Bill to Restrict Cell Phone Usage in Cars
A Colorado bill sponsored by Claire Levy, D-Boulder, aims to end cell phone use while driving for anyone under 18 and limit use to hands-free devices for adults.  The practicality of the bill is under fire, with many saying though they applaud it as a great attempt to increase safety while behind the wheel, few would follow it.  If approved, Colorado will join a select number of states with a complete ban on cell phone use for minors and hand-held phones while driving for individuals over the 18-year-old threshold.
Posted on 2009-01-16 | Comment on this post | Send to a friend | Printer-friendly version


Should the Legal Driving Age be raised?

There is a big debate in Colorado now about raising the minimum age for a teen to get their driver’s license.

I certainly see how teenagers may be going into a complete panic about now with just the suggestion of this. Teenagers look forward to the degree of independence that being able to drive on their own allows. Their parents also look forward to being freed from the demands of being an on-demand shuttle service.

With this freedom, however, comes a high degree of responsibility and, unfortunately, many teens are simply not ready for the responsibility that comes with being able to get an unrestricted license at 16 years of age.

The fact is that a younger driver is much more likely to be in an accident in the first few years after getting their license than at any other time. Whether this is attributable to age and physical maturity or simply to lack of driving experience is debatable. However, there should be certain restrictions on a young driver’s driving privileges until both of these potential factors become, by the passing of time, less of an issue.

The main restriction I think should be in place is a rule prohibiting the use of cell phones by drivers under 18. Actually, I think that this should apply to all drivers but it is such an unpopular proposal that it would not pass. Apparently, we Americans think it is acceptable to have thousands of accident deaths a year as long as we can talk on the phone on the way home from work. In any event, I have seen too many accidents involving teens who were on the phone, or even texting, while driving. One tragic accident last year involved a teen driver who hit and killed a cyclist while texting behind the wheel.

Also, there should be a reasonable curfew for teen drivers. I do not think that there is any reason a teenager should be out on the road after 10:00 p.m. on a weeknight or after 11:00 on a weekend. If they are out after this time, it is highly likely that they will be engaging in reckless driving behavior that can lead to an accident.

Finally, we need to apply tougher penalties to younger drivers in the first few years that they have their license. Bad and reckless driving habits start early and our current system is far too lenient. If a teen driver is caught driving under the influence, or even with alcohol in their car, they should automatically lose their license for at least 2 years. If they have more than one speeding ticket in a 12-month period, the same penalty shall apply. I know this may seem harsh, but I am really tired of seeing the driving records from drivers who cause accidents and noticing that they started out as a bad driver and nothing was ever done to either push them towards safer habits or to take them off of the road.

We need to remember that driving is a privilege – not a right – and the government can restrict such privileges as it feels necessary to protect the general public. We as a society feel completely comfortable placing other restrictions on teenagers because we do not feel that the are mature enough to appreciate the consequences, such as alcohol use and voting, why should this be any different?
Posted on 2008-09-11 | Comment on this post | Send to a friend | Printer-friendly version


Three people dead after collision into ice cream shop...

On the night of September 4, 2008, three local residents were killed in a tragic collision at the intersection of S. Havana and E. Mississippi Ave. in Aurora that sent one vehicle crashing into the Baskin-Robbins on S. Havana.

From early reports, it appears as though a Chevy Suburban driven by 23 year old Francis Hernandez ran a red light at a high rate of speed while driving southbound on Havana. After crossing the intersection, the Suburban hit a Mazda pickup which was turning into a business on S. Havana. The force from the collision sent the pickup careening into the ice cream shop where a 2 year old boy was killed as he sat with his family. The two occupants of the pickup were also killed.  

Mr. Hernandez ran from the scene after his truck flipped over onto its side. He was caught a short time later and remains in jail.

Our condolences go out to the families of the victims of this horrific accident. Let us all remember to be good to those around us as they can be taken from us at any time.

The Law Firm of Jason Crawford has represented accident victims and their families for more than 14 years. If you or your family needs to talk to an experienced accident lawyer, please call us todayat (303)741-0249

 For more information, please visit our website www.DenversAccidentLawyer.com

Posted on 2008-09-05 | Comment on this post | Send to a friend | Printer-friendly version


Schoolgirl hit in crosswalk.

Danielle Barker, a 13 year old Ken Caryl resident, was seriously injured when she was hit by a Cadillac in front of her school. The girl was in a designated crosswalk at the time she was hit and the accident is still being investigated.

Liability for accidents such as these are often difficult to prove as we have to show that the victim in the crosswalk was legally crossing the intersection at the time of the accident.

I have secured settlements in several cases such as this one and know that they can be difficult, venthough the victim was withint the crosswalk. Often, the insurance company for the auto driver will try to say that the victim is somehow at fault - either entirely or in a large degree. Several local cases tried before juries have actually resulted in the jury finding that the driver was not at fault.

If you or your family member has been injured in such a crossing accident,  I urge you to contact as lawyer as soon as possible.

My firm has been handling such cases for over 14 years. For a free consultation please call (303) 741-0249.

Posted on 2008-09-05 | Comment on this post | Send to a friend | Printer-friendly version


Truck Drivers on drugs are STILL on the road...

A recent study by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed that current governement oversight is completely ineffective in keeping commerical truck drivers who have tested positive for illegal drugs off of the road. 

This study found that of 37 commercial drivers who had lost their jobs because of a positive drug test - 19 were back on the road less than one month later. These drivers may not have completed their required drug treatment and may have passed a new employment drug screen simply by using fake urine to fool drug tests.

 The problem is exacerbated by the fact that there is no national clearinghouse of information that potential employers can refer to to check a truck driver's drug history. Currently, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Subcommittee is working on legislation to create such a clearinghouse to report and verify such violations. 

As an attorney who has represented accident victims who have been injured by semi-trucks, I hope this passes quickly. A 40 ton vehicle driven by a person with an alcohol or drug problems is too much of a danger to be on our nation's highways.

For more information see: http://news.moneycentral.msn.com/provider/providerarticle.aspx?feed=AP&date=20080729&id=8914925

Posted on 2008-09-04 | Comment on this post | Send to a friend | Printer-friendly version


Call today for your
Free Consultation
(303) 741-0249
Mr. Crawford is able to meet you in your home, hospital room or in his downtown office.
Request a free brochure.
E-mail Me
Visit our website:
denversaccidentlawyer.com
Allstate forced to cut auto premiums in California
The Colorado Auto Accident Guidebook - Just Published
New Auto Med-Pay Law in Colorado
Can a personal injury lawyer really make a difference in my case?
Tort Wars
Are Smart Cars Safe?
Is there a formula for valuing personal injury cases?
The Worst Insurance Companies in America
New Treatment Protocols for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Patients
The Law Firm of Jason Crawford, LLC | 450 E. 17th Ave., Suite 400 | Denver, CO 80203 | (303) 741-0249